Movie DnD and Volatile Toolbox DnD

-

I observed some discussion on Matt Colville on Discord this morning, and it reminded me of an idea I had some time ago related to one of Matt's ideas, but taken a whole different way.

I used to like Matt... just before I discovered the OSR. Then I left and haven't looked back. But I have some hazy memories that have resisted suppression. They haunt me, when I am alone late at night after a cancelled session (like yesterday, when I was too sick to run my usual game). Anyways, in one of Matt's videos, he classifies certain players as 'audience members,' meaning that they just sit back and watch the show. Matt (if I remember the video correctly), takes no umbrage at players doing this. Fine.

I want to flip this classification around on the GM, and ask, if you have audience members at your table, are you writing a movie? After being immersed in OSR ideas for a while, this seems like a headache. Those familiar (which is probably everybody reading) will understand what I mean. Why write a movie when you can provide tools for interactive fun?

So here comes my big-c Classification: Movie DnD and Toolbox DnD. Movie DnD is what a first GM thinks DnD is like: you plan a big epic story and guide your players through it. Because... you're in charge and you think it's cool. You better hope your players are on board, or you're going to have to do some railroading, if your group doesn't fall apart.

Toolbox DnD is the usual situations, not plots point: provide interactive and open-ended problems and ambiguities that allow the PCs to shape their experience. Tired of campaigns failing because people lose interest? Let them shape their own interest by providing simple options that are full of potential. Two guys in the woods is an easy one. Big blind foe worked for me recently. Just have a Cool Idea that seems hard. Players can then poke and prod it however they feel... and it's quite fun. On both sides of the screen (if you use one).

So why not write a movie? Well, most movies are flops. This is true of actual movies and DnD campaigns. What percentage of campaigns go past 5 sessions? Most flop after just a few. Then all your hard work is out the window. You can spend the time to recruit and vet players, to divine if they will go along with your campaign... and still fail. And waste time you could be playing DnD!

On the other hand, cool ideas never die. I have ~4 cool ideas I keep on hand and I usually just remix them for the current adventure. The highly variable mix of players, larger game setting, and my mood even, creates different, and fun results each time! And this is easy to do. Just mix and remix; combine, splice, and multiply the elements.

Your toolbox should be unpredictable, but straightforward enough to resolve each action individually. You should present something that can go out of control. This is fun. This is exciting. A tame adventure is no adventure. Don't you hate movies where you know how it ends 5 minutes in? You can guess the twist? That's how prewritten campaigns go.

Move beyond writing stories. You can do that in Microsoft Word. Play with the people at the table, and don't ignore them for your own purposes. Do you want a rich world in your game? Have it fight back and genuinely challenge, to the point of impasse or death. Go crazy. Be courageous, stupid, and remember, the enemies want to kill the PCs. Let them do that, if they can.


JOESKY Tax: My d66 plant table for my current plant-y megadungeon. This was buried in a python script in a previous post, but whatever.

  "cactus",
  "orchid",
  "lichen",
  "mushroom",
  "venus fly trap",
  "water lily",
  "rose",
  "sunflower",
  "corn",
  "oak",
  "bushes/topiary",
  "kelp",
  "dandelion",
  "crabgrass",
  "kudzu",
  "sequoia",
  "tropical flower",
  "coffee",
  "pine",
  "marsh grass",
  "palm plant",
  "mangrove",
  "apple",
  "bamboo",
  "ivy",
  "vines",
  "tumbleweed",
  "pitcher plant",
  "wild grass",
  "edelweiss",
  "tea",
  "pinecone",
  "rice",
  "coconut",
  "acorn",

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thinking Small: The Fictional World has a Surprising Amount of Detail

-
Probably a year or two ago I read a blog post from outside the DnD-sphere, Reality has a surprising amount of detail . It stuck with me all this time, and eventually the little worm in my brain that this post spawned crawled and ate its way through my neatly compartmentalized mind into my DnD brain. I haven't reread the article since my first reading, but the title is what really stuck with me. The worm has digested this idea, and the result is a little nugget of an idea I want to expand upon here. The blog post talks first about how constructing a set of wooden steps, in a precise manner, is actually quite difficult. Figuring out how the pieces of wood should be cut, fit together, and secured take some planning and precision. This is all to make stairs that simply fit together. Bearing weight is another manner. The OSR is all about having a "realistic" world - one that operates on consistent internal logic, even with fantastical elements. That means if you really wanted
Read more

Empty Rooms Should be Just That and the 5 Room Dungeon

-
Just a quick explanation of an OSR dungeon design principle for those unfamiliar. This is maybe not a well-touted idea, but I've been brewing on this idea lately. Of course, this is all centered around how I want to play, run... etc... Take with coarse grained salt if you think your goals are different. If you've got a dungeon, you should have some empty rooms that don't.... do anything. As in, there is nothing 'to do' in the room. I have been brewing this idea based on what Luke Gearing said in his interview on the "Into the Megadungeon" podcast. I'll just rehash what Luke conveyed in my listening: Empty rooms provide a place to rest (my words) Empty rooms give space to a dungeon so that you don't die at every turn Empty rooms are tactically important for managing encounters, especially in conjunction with loops   Luke gave an easy example of how to utilize empty rooms: You pass through some empty rooms, and eventually encounter a big room with a
Read more

Thinking Small Adventures

-
 I want to explain a philosophy for adventure design I have developed on, I hope: thinking small. Honey I Shrunk the Adventure! Many good adventures give lots of play out of small packages. This is not a new idea. The 3 hex campaign start and 5 room dungeon are known for giving creativity via constraints (a well-touted idea). Brevity in the adventure text is also a much-loved and effective way to give creativity through vagueries. I see these as a part of a core rule of thumb: do more with less. I think this is a great design philosophy. I would like to push it a bit further, and to a potentially new aspect of the rule of thumb, that deserves just as much attention. Before, I have written a  scenario premise , which you can get a whole session out of (in most cases), and I've mentioned before having a cool idea . I want to propose a design philosophy: have the core danger of a setting fit into a single coherent description, and a summary of an adventure location fit into a paragrap
Read more