Thinking Small Adventures

-

 I want to explain a philosophy for adventure design I have developed on, I hope: thinking small.

Honey I Shrunk the Adventure!

Many good adventures give lots of play out of small packages. This is not a new idea. The 3 hex campaign start and 5 room dungeon are known for giving creativity via constraints (a well-touted idea). Brevity in the adventure text is also a much-loved and effective way to give creativity through vagueries. I see these as a part of a core rule of thumb: do more with less.

I think this is a great design philosophy. I would like to push it a bit further, and to a potentially new aspect of the rule of thumb, that deserves just as much attention. Before, I have written a scenario premise, which you can get a whole session out of (in most cases), and I've mentioned before having a cool idea. I want to propose a design philosophy: have the core danger of a setting fit into a single coherent description, and a summary of an adventure location fit into a paragraph or so.

A Cool Idea

I'm a firm believer that a good session revolves around a central activity or conflict. Completing the activity or resolving the conflict should be the goal of a single session. Its focus makes GM prep easier, its resolution provides good session structure, and it provides a chunk to fit into a larger campaign. 

This may sound like one-shot stuff, but I think campaigns should also be broken into linked cool ideas. This provides a natural session-length structure and gives a more gripping session when a campaign might feel like it slogs through the same type of material.

I think a cool idea is viable when it can be summarized pretty succinctly (maybe not literally one sentence, but succinctly). Many of my favorite adventures fit this. Lair of the Lamb can be summarized as "You are trapped in a dungeon with a giant monstrosity. Can you escape before being eaten?" Tomb Robbers of the Crystal Frontier can be summarized as "Can you loot the giant crystal tomb, fallen from the sky, and fend off its alien residents?" If it doesn't sound cool in a format like this, it may not be as cool as you think.

I think this provides a lot of centrality for a game as well. What are we doing in the dungeon? Well, refer to central activity/conflict and you have your answer. This gives players more to do than just wander from room to room. It sets up conflicts to have opinions on, and that guides plans and actions.

This eases GM prep as well, by not having to come up with many disconnected elements for an adventure location. It should all be somehow, some way, fitting with the central idea. The ideas can all flow from there. Just consider your conflict from a local, regional, or global perspective and the interactions that it has on that scale.

Think small: a short description should have a lot of adventure potential.

Where do Cool Ideas Come From?

Messenger pigeons deliver them to expecting GMs. But seriously, I want to reiterate the best advice on cool ideas: rip off stuff. Mix and remix ideas, combine, splice, and multiply the elements. Follow your dreams, especially your nightmares. Watch books and read movies. Scribbly a podcast. Ok I'm just saying random words now. Get on a chaise lounge and free associate, have a friend take notes (the ORIGINAL slush pile, if I do say so).

Here are some Cool Ideas for you to start with:

  • Bomb defusal
  • Silent Gardens (as referenced above)
  • Hostage situation
  • Trapped with THE BEAST (a la LotL, or Over the Garden Wall)
  • Recover delicate ancient artifact (Indiana Jones, Archive 81... maybe.)
  • Exorcise a possessed house (Poltergeist, Monster House)
  • Help a haunted painter (Duma Key)
  • Hunt down feral vampire (RuneScape... kinda)
  • Why are the animals talking? Why do they say such mean things? (ok getting off the chaise lounge now)

Combine, splice, and multiply. And think small.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thinking Small: The Fictional World has a Surprising Amount of Detail

-
Probably a year or two ago I read a blog post from outside the DnD-sphere, Reality has a surprising amount of detail . It stuck with me all this time, and eventually the little worm in my brain that this post spawned crawled and ate its way through my neatly compartmentalized mind into my DnD brain. I haven't reread the article since my first reading, but the title is what really stuck with me. The worm has digested this idea, and the result is a little nugget of an idea I want to expand upon here. The blog post talks first about how constructing a set of wooden steps, in a precise manner, is actually quite difficult. Figuring out how the pieces of wood should be cut, fit together, and secured take some planning and precision. This is all to make stairs that simply fit together. Bearing weight is another manner. The OSR is all about having a "realistic" world - one that operates on consistent internal logic, even with fantastical elements. That means if you really wanted
Read more

Empty Rooms Should be Just That and the 5 Room Dungeon

-
Just a quick explanation of an OSR dungeon design principle for those unfamiliar. This is maybe not a well-touted idea, but I've been brewing on this idea lately. Of course, this is all centered around how I want to play, run... etc... Take with coarse grained salt if you think your goals are different. If you've got a dungeon, you should have some empty rooms that don't.... do anything. As in, there is nothing 'to do' in the room. I have been brewing this idea based on what Luke Gearing said in his interview on the "Into the Megadungeon" podcast. I'll just rehash what Luke conveyed in my listening: Empty rooms provide a place to rest (my words) Empty rooms give space to a dungeon so that you don't die at every turn Empty rooms are tactically important for managing encounters, especially in conjunction with loops   Luke gave an easy example of how to utilize empty rooms: You pass through some empty rooms, and eventually encounter a big room with a
Read more